IBM ibm_brisbane vs IBM ibm_kawasaki
Side-by-side comparison over the metrics both devices report. Values come from different sources with different methodologies — mind the provenance badges; vendor-reported figures are manufacturer claims.
| Metric |
IBM ibm_brisbane
IBM · Apache-2.0
|
IBM ibm_kawasaki
IBM · Apache-2.0
|
|---|---|---|
| Best 2Q fidelity (higher better) | 0.996343 | 0.995871 |
| Median 2Q error (lower better) | 0.007676 | 0.008135 |
| Median T1 (µs) (higher better) | 231.95 µs | 193.77 µs |
| Median T2 (µs) (higher better) | 150.04 µs | 150.76 µs |
Captured: 2024-06-01 (ibm_brisbane) · 2024-06-01 (ibm_kawasaki).
Full histories: ibm_brisbane ·
ibm_kawasaki ·
leaderboard.