IBM ibm_cusco

IBM · Apache-2.0 last capture 2025-02-26

ibm_cusco is a 127-qubit IBM quantum computer, with records from 2024 to 2025.

On its latest calibration (26 February 2025), a typical two-qubit operation failed about 1 in 46, better than 12% of the 65 other devices in this record.

The newest record is from 26 February 2025, so the machine may since have been upgraded or retired.

Every figure below is the device's latest measurement of that metric, with its own date and source. See how the whole field is progressing →

Best 2Q fidelity
IBM · Apache-2.0
0.994453
fails about 1 in 180

Success rate of the chip's single best pair of qubits. The best pair flatters the chip; the typical one matters more.

Better than 54% of 65 other devices with this measurement
Measured 2025-02-26
Median 2Q error
IBM · Apache-2.0
0.0216762
fails about 1 in 46

How often a typical two-qubit operation on this chip fails, from the vendor's own calibration.

Better than 12% of 65 other devices with this measurement
Measured 2025-02-26
Median T1 (µs)
IBM · Apache-2.0
131.17

How long a typical qubit holds its state before it decays, in microseconds. Longer leaves more time to compute.

Better than 60% of 67 other devices with this measurement
Measured 2025-02-26
Median T2 (µs)
IBM · Apache-2.0
80.151

How long a typical qubit keeps its delicate quantum phase, in microseconds.

Better than 33% of 67 other devices with this measurement
Measured 2025-02-26
Median readout error
IBM · Apache-2.0
0.0462646
fails about 1 in 22

How often reading a typical qubit's value at the end gives the wrong answer.

Better than 12% of 67 other devices with this measurement
Measured 2025-02-26
Qubits
IBM · Apache-2.0
127

Physical qubits on the device. More only helps if they are good enough to use together.

Measured 2025-02-26

History

Each point is one dated measurement (2 snapshots in total).

Best 2Q fidelity
Median 2Q error
Median T1 (µs)
Median T2 (µs)
Median readout error
Qubits

Provenance

Source
IBM · Apache-2.0
Licence
Apache-2.0 · Qiskit fake backend calibration snapshot
Raw redistributable
yes
Captured
2025-02-26T20:35:12

Cite this page

@misc{provenova_ibm_ibm_cusco,
  title        = {IBM ibm_cusco — calibration & benchmark history},
  howpublished = {\url{https://provenova.net/hardware/ibm/ibm_cusco}},
  publisher    = {Provenova},
  note         = {accessed 2026-10-19}
}

Compare with

vs ibm ibm_aachen 5 shared metrics vs ibm ibm_algiers 5 shared metrics vs ibm ibm_auckland 5 shared metrics vs ibm ibm_berlin 5 shared metrics vs ibm ibm_boston 5 shared metrics vs ibm ibm_brisbane 5 shared metrics vs ibm ibm_brussels 5 shared metrics vs ibm ibm_cairo 5 shared metrics

Data: real IBM device calibration published in Qiskit's fake backends (Apache-2.0). Rankings on the live leaderboard.