IBM ibm_peekskill

IBM · Apache-2.0 last capture 2024-02-28

ibm_peekskill is a 27-qubit IBM quantum computer.

On its latest calibration (28 February 2024), a typical two-qubit operation failed about 1 in 100, better than 46% of the 65 other devices in this record.

The newest record is from 28 February 2024, so the machine may since have been upgraded or retired.

Every figure below is the device's latest measurement of that metric, with its own date and source. See how the whole field is progressing →

Best 2Q fidelity
IBM · Apache-2.0
0.996348
fails about 1 in 270

Success rate of the chip's single best pair of qubits. The best pair flatters the chip; the typical one matters more.

Better than 74% of 65 other devices with this measurement
Measured 2024-02-28
Median 2Q error
IBM · Apache-2.0
0.00971998
fails about 1 in 100

How often a typical two-qubit operation on this chip fails, from the vendor's own calibration.

Better than 46% of 65 other devices with this measurement
Measured 2024-02-28
Median T1 (µs)
IBM · Apache-2.0
301.15

How long a typical qubit holds its state before it decays, in microseconds. Longer leaves more time to compute.

Better than 94% of 67 other devices with this measurement
Measured 2024-02-28
Median T2 (µs)
IBM · Apache-2.0
295.9

How long a typical qubit keeps its delicate quantum phase, in microseconds.

Better than 96% of 67 other devices with this measurement
Measured 2024-02-28
Median readout error
IBM · Apache-2.0
0.0089
fails about 1 in 110

How often reading a typical qubit's value at the end gives the wrong answer.

Better than 94% of 67 other devices with this measurement
Measured 2024-02-28
Qubits
IBM · Apache-2.0
27

Physical qubits on the device. More only helps if they are good enough to use together.

Measured 2024-02-28

History

1 snapshot so far. A trend appears here once a metric has been measured on two different days.

Provenance

Source
IBM · Apache-2.0
Licence
Apache-2.0 · Qiskit fake backend calibration snapshot
Raw redistributable
yes
Captured
2024-02-28T14:02:02
Raw source (latest snapshot)
https://github.com/Qiskit/qiskit-ibm-runtime/blob/32b0dbc364af3b468be50e18797acf9352f2ff94/qiskit_ibm_runtime/fake_provider/backends/peekskill/props_peekskill.json

Cite this page

@misc{provenova_ibm_ibm_peekskill,
  title        = {IBM ibm_peekskill — calibration & benchmark history},
  howpublished = {\url{https://provenova.net/hardware/ibm/ibm_peekskill}},
  publisher    = {Provenova},
  note         = {accessed 2026-10-19}
}

Compare with

vs ibm ibm_aachen 5 shared metrics vs ibm ibm_algiers 5 shared metrics vs ibm ibm_auckland 5 shared metrics vs ibm ibm_berlin 5 shared metrics vs ibm ibm_boston 5 shared metrics vs ibm ibm_brisbane 5 shared metrics vs ibm ibm_brussels 5 shared metrics vs ibm ibm_cairo 5 shared metrics

Data: real IBM device calibration published in Qiskit's fake backends (Apache-2.0). Rankings on the live leaderboard.