IBM ibmq_london

IBM · Apache-2.0 last capture 2020-08-10

ibmq_london is a 5-qubit IBM quantum computer.

On its latest calibration (10 August 2020), a typical two-qubit operation failed about 1 in 92, better than 37% of the 65 other devices in this record.

The newest record is from 10 August 2020, so the machine may since have been upgraded or retired.

Every figure below is the device's latest measurement of that metric, with its own date and source. See how the whole field is progressing →

Best 2Q fidelity
IBM · Apache-2.0
0.991587
fails about 1 in 120

Success rate of the chip's single best pair of qubits. The best pair flatters the chip; the typical one matters more.

Better than 22% of 65 other devices with this measurement
Measured 2020-08-10
Median 2Q error
IBM · Apache-2.0
0.0108883
fails about 1 in 92

How often a typical two-qubit operation on this chip fails, from the vendor's own calibration.

Better than 37% of 65 other devices with this measurement
Measured 2020-08-10
Median T1 (µs)
IBM · Apache-2.0
68.829

How long a typical qubit holds its state before it decays, in microseconds. Longer leaves more time to compute.

Better than 18% of 67 other devices with this measurement
Measured 2020-08-10
Median T2 (µs)
IBM · Apache-2.0
74.632

How long a typical qubit keeps its delicate quantum phase, in microseconds.

Better than 24% of 67 other devices with this measurement
Measured 2020-08-10
Median readout error
IBM · Apache-2.0
0.03
fails about 1 in 33

How often reading a typical qubit's value at the end gives the wrong answer.

Better than 31% of 67 other devices with this measurement
Measured 2020-08-10
Qubits
IBM · Apache-2.0
5

Physical qubits on the device. More only helps if they are good enough to use together.

Measured 2020-08-10

History

Each point is one dated measurement (5 snapshots in total).

Best 2Q fidelity
Median 2Q error
Median T1 (µs)
Median T2 (µs)
Median readout error
Qubits

Provenance

Source
IBM · Apache-2.0
Licence
Apache-2.0 · Qiskit fake backend calibration snapshot
Raw redistributable
yes
Captured
2020-08-10T07:21:18

Cite this page

@misc{provenova_ibm_ibmq_london,
  title        = {IBM ibmq_london — calibration & benchmark history},
  howpublished = {\url{https://provenova.net/hardware/ibm/ibmq_london}},
  publisher    = {Provenova},
  note         = {accessed 2026-10-19}
}

Compare with

vs ibm ibm_aachen 5 shared metrics vs ibm ibm_algiers 5 shared metrics vs ibm ibm_auckland 5 shared metrics vs ibm ibm_berlin 5 shared metrics vs ibm ibm_boston 5 shared metrics vs ibm ibm_brisbane 5 shared metrics vs ibm ibm_brussels 5 shared metrics vs ibm ibm_cairo 5 shared metrics

Data: real IBM device calibration published in Qiskit's fake backends (Apache-2.0). Rankings on the live leaderboard.